[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Geiser-users] ‘geiser-guile-load-path’ v s. ‘%load-compiled-path’

From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: [Geiser-users] ‘geiser-guile-load-path’ v s. ‘%load-compiled-path’
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 23:15:20 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Fri, Sep 13 2013, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Howdy!
> [...]
>>> And can we share the directories in geiser-guile-load-path for both
>>> non-compiled and compiled paths or is it better to have separate lists?
>> For the purposes of Geiser, I think it’s better to have a single list
>> (even for Guile itself, it’s not clear to me what having separate lists
>> buys us.)
>>> We also have a command to augment %load-path while the REPL is running:
>>> would it make sense to add also the requested directory to
>>> %load-compiled-path? (having a separate command sound a bit too much,
>>> but is doable if that's the right thing to do...)
>> What do you mean by “while the REPL is running”?
> M-x geiser-add-to-load-path

Ah, OK.

> That will ask for a directory and send a command to Guile adding it to
> %load-path.  If i understand correctly, all that's needed is to also add
> the directory to %load-compiled-path, and use the command automatically
> at Guile startup with the contents of geiser-load-path.
> Does that make sense?

It sure does.

Thank you!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]