getfem-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch devel-tetsuo-xml


From: Yves Renard
Subject: Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch devel-tetsuo-xml
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:26:28 +0200 (CEST)

Dear Tetsuo,

The merge is done.

Best regards,

Yves

----- Mail original -----
De: "Tetsuo Koyama" <tkoyama010@gmail.com>
À: "logari81" <logari81@googlemail.com>, "yves renard" 
<yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>, "getfem-commits" <getfem-commits@nongnu.org>
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Octobre 2020 06:43:32
Objet: Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch devel-tetsuo-xml

Dear Kostas and Yves

I added a check in the test.

Thanks.

Best regards Tetsuo

2020年10月5日(月) 12:29 Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com>:

> Dear Kostas
>
> > I had misunderstood the test, obviously you cannot hardcode the result
> that needs to be checked. So you will just have to skip the test if pyvista
> is not available. But I still believe we should not require or check for
> pyvista in the configure script, just for one test case. So please add this
> check in the test itself.
> Got it. Thanks for your message.
>
> Best regards Tetsuo.
>
> 2020年10月5日(月) 5:42 Konstantinos Poulios <logari81@googlemail.com>:
>
>> Dear Tetsuo
>>
>> I had misunderstood the test, obviously you cannot hardcode the result
>> that needs to be checked. So you will just have to skip the test if pyvista
>> is not available. But I still believe we should not require or check for
>> pyvista in the configure script, just for one test case. So please add this
>> check in the test itself.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Kostas
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 5:41 PM Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Yves and Kostas
>>>
>>> Thank you for your feedback.
>>>
>>> I will follow the last option. I will contact you later.
>>>
>>> 2020年10月4日(日) 23:39 Konstantinos Poulios <logari81@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Tetsuo
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the rest of the code it looks nice and clean. No objections
>>>> from my side. Thanks for the nice work.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Kostas
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 4:23 PM Konstantinos Poulios <
>>>> logari81@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the last option is the simplest.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Tetsuo you could substitute the lines
>>>>>     actual = unstructured_grid.points[:, 0]
>>>>> and
>>>>>     actual = unstructured_grid.cell_connectivity
>>>>> with
>>>>>     actual = [.....]            <--- hardcoded result
>>>>>     if unstructured_grid: <--- unstructured_grid==None if pyvista is
>>>>> missing
>>>>>        actual = unstructured_grid.points[:, 0]
>>>>> and
>>>>>     actual = [.....]            <--- hardcoded result
>>>>>     if unstructured_grid: <--- unstructured_grid==None if pyvista is
>>>>> missing
>>>>>        actual = unstructured_grid.cell_connectivity
>>>>> Otherwise thank for your code, I will also have a look at the rest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Kostas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 4:06 PM Yves Renard <yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Tetsuo and Kostas,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tetsuo, thank you for your developpment.
>>>>>> I understand that you introduced a new dependance on the pyvista
>>>>>> python package (only for a test program). There is several possibilities 
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Force the presence of the package in configure.ac (i.e. stop the
>>>>>> configure if the package is not present)
>>>>>> - Detect the presence in a configure variable such as PYTHON_PYVISTA
>>>>>> and disable the test if the package is not installed (eventually warning 
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> the end of the configure file when it is nor present)
>>>>>> - Detect directly the presence of the package in the python test
>>>>>> program.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think is the best ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yves
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Mail original -----
>>>>>> De: "Tetsuo Koyama" <tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>>>>>> À: "yves renard" <yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>, "logari81" <
>>>>>> logari81@googlemail.com>, "getfem-commits" <getfem-commits@nongnu.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> Envoyé: Dimanche 4 Octobre 2020 03:46:02
>>>>>> Objet: Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch devel-tetsuo-xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. Sorry, I pushed devel-tetsuo-xml-binary by mistake. Delete
>>>>>> devel-tetsuo-xml-binary and merge devel-tetsuo-xml-binary-squash with
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> commit squashed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2020年10月4日(日) 10:02 Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Dear Yves and Kostas
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I hope you are well.  I finally completed adding the VTU binary
>>>>>> output
>>>>>> > and its testing.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I added "tests/python/check_export_vtu.py" to test the output of the
>>>>>> > VTK/VTU file in more detail.
>>>>>> > To run this test you need to use pyvisa which can be installed by
>>>>>> command.
>>>>>> > $ pip3 install pyvista
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Could you please merge devel-tetsuo-xml-binary-squash ?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Best Regards
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2020年5月28日(木) 20:54 Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Dear Yves
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thank you for your merge.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Dear Kostas
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thank you for your comment. I will fix it in next branch.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Best regards Tetsuo
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> 2020年5月28日(木) 19:14 Yves Renard <yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Dear all,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > I did the merge.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Best regards,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Yves
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > ----- Mail original -----
>>>>>> >> > De: "logari81" <logari81@googlemail.com>
>>>>>> >> > À: "Tetsuo Koyama" <tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> > Cc: "yves renard" <yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>, "getfem-commits" <
>>>>>> >> getfem-commits@nongnu.org>
>>>>>> >> > Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Mai 2020 16:47:40
>>>>>> >> > Objet: Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch devel-tetsuo-xml
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > it looks good and clean. Thanks. I will do the merge later if
>>>>>> Yves
>>>>>> >> doesn't
>>>>>> >> > do it first.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Just a minor comment. Now in modern C++ we use to rewrite the
>>>>>> old loops
>>>>>> >> > like this
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > for (size_type i=0; i < s.size(); ++i) {
>>>>>> >> >   write_val(int(vtk_simplex_code[s[i].dim()]));
>>>>>> >> > }
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > to
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > for (const auto &val : s)
>>>>>> >> >   write_val(int(vtk_simplex_code[val.dim()]));
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > if possible. You can also drop the extra brackets {} if they are
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> >> > necessary.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > BR
>>>>>> >> > Kostas
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:03 AM Tetsuo Koyama <
>>>>>> tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > > P.S. branch is devel-tetsuo-xml-slices
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > 2020年5月27日(水) 10:02 Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > Dear all
>>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > I added the following functions and confirmed that the test
>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>> >> It
>>>>>> >> > > > is ready for merge.
>>>>>> >> > > > > 2) make exporting slices work for VTU. Based on my
>>>>>> refactored
>>>>>> >> version,
>>>>>> >> > > it shouldn't be difficult.
>>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > I plan to add 1) 3) after this.
>>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > BR Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > 2020年5月26日(火) 2:01 Yves Renard <yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>:
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Dear all,
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Ok, I merged the branch and I will proceed with 5.4.1 patch
>>>>>> >> version.
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Best regards,
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Yves
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > ----- Mail original -----
>>>>>> >> > > > > De: "logari81" <logari81@googlemail.com>
>>>>>> >> > > > > À: "Tetsuo Koyama" <tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> > > > > Cc: "getfem-commits" <getfem-commits@nongnu.org>, "yves
>>>>>> renard" <
>>>>>> >> > > yves.renard@insa-lyon.fr>
>>>>>> >> > > > > Envoyé: Lundi 25 Mai 2020 15:04:23
>>>>>> >> > > > > Objet: Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch
>>>>>> devel-tetsuo-xml
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Dear Tetsuo,
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Great, thanks for testing and for the original vtu
>>>>>> >> implementation. It
>>>>>> >> > > is a
>>>>>> >> > > > > very useful feature.
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > I will let Yves do the merge. I think he will prepare a
>>>>>> 5.4.1
>>>>>> >> version
>>>>>> >> > > soon
>>>>>> >> > > > > to fix the issues with 5.4. on Ubuntu 20.04.
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > Best regards
>>>>>> >> > > > > Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:32 PM Tetsuo Koyama <
>>>>>> >> tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> > > wrote:
>>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > Dear Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > My test of branch devel-logari81-xml was passed.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > Your branch is awesome.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > I think it is a very good idea to add vtk as a option
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > Could you merge this branch?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > After that I will checkout new branch to add more
>>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > Best regards Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > 2020年5月24日(日) 20:49 Tetsuo Koyama <tkoyama010@gmail.com
>>>>>> >:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > Dear Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > Sorry for my late reply and thank you for your
>>>>>> refactoring.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > I'll check it and will continue you proposal. After I
>>>>>> finished
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > development, I'll contact getfem project to merge.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > Thanks for your advice.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > Best regards Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > 2020年5月24日(日) 4:13 Konstantinos Poulios <
>>>>>> >> logari81@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Dear Tetsuo,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > I have revised your code and refactored it in my
>>>>>> >> > > logari81-devel-xml
>>>>>> >> > > > > > branch. Can you test that my refactored version works as
>>>>>> your
>>>>>> >> > > original
>>>>>> >> > > > > > version? I removed your "only_mesh" option intentionally.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Moreover, it would be nice if you could:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > 1) implement the scripting interface for vtu export.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > 2) make exporting slices work for VTU. Based on my
>>>>>> >> refactored
>>>>>> >> > > version,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > it shouldn't be difficult.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > 3) implement the binary version of VTU.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Best regards
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:35 PM Tetsuo Koyama <
>>>>>> >> > > tkoyama010@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> I forgot to CC: in the last email, so I am
>>>>>> re-sending it.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> ----------
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> Dear Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> Thank you for your reply.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks for your answer. Your code looks quite nice
>>>>>> >> actually.
>>>>>> >> > > I have
>>>>>> >> > > > > > one question about the lines
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> >       std::vector<scalar_type>
>>>>>> W(Q*pmf_dof_used.card());
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> >       gmm::copy(remove_dof_unused(V,
>>>>>> pmf_dof_used, Q),
>>>>>> >> W);
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> >       write_dataset_(V, name, qdim);
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > Since you do not do anything with vector W, what
>>>>>> is the
>>>>>> >> > > meaning of
>>>>>> >> > > > > > having it? Should the last line be:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> >       write_dataset_(W, name, qdim);
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > instead?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> Yes you are right. Sorry my test was not enough. I
>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>> >> it.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > You can just make a new branch and put the
>>>>>> outcome of
>>>>>> >> your
>>>>>> >> > > > > > development in one or two commits and then we can merge
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> >> branch.
>>>>>> >> > > Sorry
>>>>>> >> > > > > > for being picky, but establishing some good development
>>>>>> habits
>>>>>> >> will
>>>>>> >> > > make
>>>>>> >> > > > > > our life easier in the future.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> Thanks. Your advice is very helpful to me. I made
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> >> branch
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> devel-tetsuo-xml02. It is a squash of commit of
>>>>>> >> > > devel-tetsuo-xml.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> Thank you for reading.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> Best regards Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > 2020年5月11日(月) 5:16 Konstantinos Poulios <
>>>>>> >> > > logari81@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > Dear Tetsuo,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > Thanks for your answer. Your code looks quite
>>>>>> nice
>>>>>> >> > > actually. I
>>>>>> >> > > > > > have one question about the lines
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >       std::vector<scalar_type>
>>>>>> >> W(Q*pmf_dof_used.card());
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >       gmm::copy(remove_dof_unused(V,
>>>>>> pmf_dof_used, Q),
>>>>>> >> W);
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >       write_dataset_(V, name, qdim);
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > Since you do not do anything with vector W,
>>>>>> what is the
>>>>>> >> > > meaning
>>>>>> >> > > > > > of having it? Should the last line be:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >       write_dataset_(W, name, qdim);
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > instead?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > Apart from that, I think we need a bit cleaner
>>>>>> workflow
>>>>>> >> > > without
>>>>>> >> > > > > > too many unnecessary commits. I remember that I had
>>>>>> advised you
>>>>>> >> in
>>>>>> >> > > the past
>>>>>> >> > > > > > against too large commits, but the ideal is somewhere in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> >> middle.
>>>>>> >> > > The
>>>>>> >> > > > > > commits must in general be organized in logical units
>>>>>> from the
>>>>>> >> > > perspective
>>>>>> >> > > > > > of someone looking at the git history. The work you have
>>>>>> done
>>>>>> >> here,
>>>>>> >> > > I would
>>>>>> >> > > > > > put it into one or two commits. All the forth and back
>>>>>> during
>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>> >> > > > > > development, it doesn't need to be part of the repository
>>>>>> >> history.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > You can just make a new branch and put the
>>>>>> outcome of
>>>>>> >> your
>>>>>> >> > > > > > development in one or two commits and then we can merge
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> >> branch.
>>>>>> >> > > Sorry
>>>>>> >> > > > > > for being picky, but establishing some good development
>>>>>> habits
>>>>>> >> will
>>>>>> >> > > make
>>>>>> >> > > > > > our life easier in the future.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > Best regards
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:23 PM Tetsuo Koyama <
>>>>>> >> > > > > > tkoyama010@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> P.S.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> I had a typo
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >That is a good point. It maybe a good idea of
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> >> > > library,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > but we
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> have to use cmake to link vtk librayr.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> That is a good point. It maybe a good idea of
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> >> > > library, but
>>>>>> >> > > > > > we
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> have to use cmake to link vtk library.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> 2020年5月7日(木) 22:17 Tetsuo Koyama <
>>>>>> >> tkoyama010@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Dear Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Thank you very much for taking the time to
>>>>>> review.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > I think it is an important contribution to
>>>>>> add vtu
>>>>>> >> > > support,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > especially if it is binary/compressed, just ascii is not
>>>>>> very
>>>>>> >> useful.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Thanks. I agree that binary/compressed is
>>>>>> important.
>>>>>> >> > > After
>>>>>> >> > > > > > this change
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > is confirmed, I would like to add that
>>>>>> option.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > However we might need to discuss a bit on
>>>>>> how to
>>>>>> >> do
>>>>>> >> > > it. As
>>>>>> >> > > > > > far as I can see you have used boost for xml writing. I
>>>>>> think we
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > had dropped our dependency on boost and I
>>>>>> am not
>>>>>> >> very
>>>>>> >> > > keen
>>>>>> >> > > > > > on reintroducing a dependency on boost.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > I agree with the policy that projects don't
>>>>>> use
>>>>>> >> boost.
>>>>>> >> > > In the
>>>>>> >> > > > > > end, I
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > made changes to eliminate the dependence on
>>>>>> boost
>>>>>> >> in the
>>>>>> >> > > end.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > If there
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > is any remaining dependence, please point
>>>>>> out . I am
>>>>>> >> > > sorry
>>>>>> >> > > > > > that the
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > commit is complicated. The current vtu
>>>>>> object does
>>>>>> >> not
>>>>>> >> > > require
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > dependency to boost even if when extending to
>>>>>> >> binaries.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >Before we merge this, I would like to hear
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> >> > > arguments for
>>>>>> >> > > > > > one solution or another. The first thing to check is what
>>>>>> >> others do.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > How is vtu export implemented in other
>>>>>> software
>>>>>> >> like
>>>>>> >> > > e.g.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > fenics? What is the more future-proof way of
>>>>>> implementing vtu
>>>>>> >> > > support?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > I didn't search fenics but meshio package
>>>>>> (This is a
>>>>>> >> > > major
>>>>>> >> > > > > > package
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > which is used to convert mesh format. You can
>>>>>> >> install by
>>>>>> >> > > `apt
>>>>>> >> > > > > > install
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > python3-meshio`) and mayavi2.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Both are built by full scratches of writing
>>>>>> text and
>>>>>> >> > > binary
>>>>>> >> > > > > > like
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > getfem project is doing. They reffer vtk file
>>>>>> >> format pdf.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > https://vtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/file-formats.pdf
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > What is a solution with least
>>>>>> dependencies? If we
>>>>>> >> have
>>>>>> >> > > to
>>>>>> >> > > > > > depend on an external library it might be better to
>>>>>> depend
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > on vtk directly
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> https://www.paraview.org/Wiki/VTK/Examples/Cxx/IO/WriteVTU
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > That is a good point. It maybe a good idea
>>>>>> of using
>>>>>> >> > > library,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > but we
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > have to use cmake to link vtk librayr. I
>>>>>> think it is
>>>>>> >> > > difficult
>>>>>> >> > > > > > to use
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > with getfem using automake. (Is there any
>>>>>> plan to
>>>>>> >> use
>>>>>> >> > > cmake in
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > getfem?)
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > This is hello world of vtk library.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> https://lorensen.github.io/VTKExamples/site/Cxx/GeometricObjects/CylinderExample/
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > Have you done some research regarding these
>>>>>> >> questions?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > That is all. If I need I search of fenics I
>>>>>> will do
>>>>>> >> it !
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > There is also another thing that I would
>>>>>> like to
>>>>>> >> ask
>>>>>> >> > > you
>>>>>> >> > > > > > about. Could you please don't use markup in your git
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>> >> > > description? It
>>>>>> >> > > > > > might look nice in your git client but it looks ugly and
>>>>>> >> difficult
>>>>>> >> > > to read
>>>>>> >> > > > > > on other's systems.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Thank you for pointing it out. I used emoji
>>>>>> prefix
>>>>>> >> which
>>>>>> >> > > is
>>>>>> >> > > > > > popular in
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > my local. It is not good to use it in a
>>>>>> global
>>>>>> >> community.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > Sorry.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > just to add that for compressed vtu files
>>>>>> I use
>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>> >> > > attached
>>>>>> >> > > > > > conversion script based on binary vtk files exported from
>>>>>> >> getfem.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Thanks. I'll use it.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Thank you for reading.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > BR Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > 2020年5月7日(木) 19:21 Konstantinos Poulios <
>>>>>> >> > > > > > logari81@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > just to add that for compressed vtu files
>>>>>> I use
>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>> >> > > attached
>>>>>> >> > > > > > conversion script based on binary vtk files exported from
>>>>>> >> getfem.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:59 AM
>>>>>> Konstantinos
>>>>>> >> Poulios <
>>>>>> >> > > > > > logari81@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> Dear Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> I think it is an important contribution
>>>>>> to add
>>>>>> >> vtu
>>>>>> >> > > support,
>>>>>> >> > > > > > especially if it is binary/compressed, just ascii is not
>>>>>> very
>>>>>> >> useful.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > However we might need to discuss a bit on how to do it.
>>>>>> As far
>>>>>> >> as I
>>>>>> >> > > can see
>>>>>> >> > > > > > you have used boost for xml writing. I think we had
>>>>>> dropped our
>>>>>> >> > > dependency
>>>>>> >> > > > > > on boost and I am not very keen on reintroducing a
>>>>>> dependency on
>>>>>> >> > > boost.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> Before we merge this, I would like to
>>>>>> hear some
>>>>>> >> > > arguments
>>>>>> >> > > > > > for one solution or another. The first thing to check is
>>>>>> what
>>>>>> >> others
>>>>>> >> > > do.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > How is vtu export implemented in other software like e.g.
>>>>>> >> fenics?
>>>>>> >> > > What is
>>>>>> >> > > > > > the more future-proof way of implementing vtu support?
>>>>>> What is a
>>>>>> >> > > solution
>>>>>> >> > > > > > with least dependencies? If we have to depend on an
>>>>>> external
>>>>>> >> library
>>>>>> >> > > it
>>>>>> >> > > > > > might be better to depend on vtk directly
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> https://www.paraview.org/Wiki/VTK/Examples/Cxx/IO/WriteVTU
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> Have you done some research regarding
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> >> questions?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> There is also another thing that I would
>>>>>> like to
>>>>>> >> ask
>>>>>> >> > > you
>>>>>> >> > > > > > about. Could you please don't use markup in your git
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>> >> > > description? It
>>>>>> >> > > > > > might look nice in your git client but it looks ugly and
>>>>>> >> difficult
>>>>>> >> > > to read
>>>>>> >> > > > > > on other's systems.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> Best regards
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> Kostas
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:07 AM Tetsuo
>>>>>> Koyama <
>>>>>> >> > > > > > tkoyama010@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> Dear getfem project
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> Could you merge devel-tetsuo-xml?
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> This branch is addition of vtu_export
>>>>>> class.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> By using this class we can export xml
>>>>>> >> unstructured
>>>>>> >> > > grid
>>>>>> >> > > > > > format vtk
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> (only ascii format and write_point_data).
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> I tested it by using meshio package (
>>>>>> >> > > > > > https://github.com/nschloe/meshio).
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> In the future, the binary format and
>>>>>> >> write_cell_data
>>>>>> >> > > > > > method may be extended.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> Thank you for reading.
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>> BR Tetsuo
>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >>>
>>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]