Re: [Getfem-users] Conflict between GMM and LAPACKE

[Torquil Macdonald Sørensen]

Hi!

I was able to fix the single error message from my test program which 
used the "offending" code from gmm_matrix.h, by changing to a different 
name for the function argument (not using "I").

But putting this change back into gmm_matrix.h was not enough to make my 
big program compile, because many other errors of the same type occur in 
gmm_inoutput.h, which is also used.

So I will have to take care of all the error messages at once. I will 
see if I am able to do that in a systematic way, e.g. using some kind of 
search and replace method. If I am able to do it, I will provide a patch 
for you.

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen

On 15/10/13 08:46, Yves Renard wrote:
> Ok. I tried with g++ 4.7 and I cannot even load the two header <complex>
> and <complex.h>.
> It would be interesting if you can submit a patch of gmm_matrix.h.
>
>
> Yves.
>
>
>
>
> Le 15/10/2013 00:33, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen a écrit :
> > Hi!
> >
> > On my system, I can simultaneously include "complex.h" and "complex"
> > without problems, in any order, when compiling with G++ 4.8.1.
> >
> > However, I did some more testing. It seems that "complex.h" defines
> > the symbol "I". E.g., the following compiles and runs:
> >
> > #include "complex.h"
> > int main() { std::cout << I << std::endl; }
> >
> > If complex.h is included before gmm_matrix.h, this causes problems in
> > gmm_matrix.h at a point in the code where "I" is used as the name of a
> > function argument:
> >
> > void add(const identity_matrix &I, const M &v1)
> >
> > (on line 67 in gmm_matrix.h)
> >
> > I copied some of that code out to a small test program, and solved the
> > compilation problem (just for that little piece of code) by just
> > changing the name of that function argument.
> >
> > However, I have asked on the LAPACK forum if it is possible to stop it
> > from including "complex.h".
> >
> > Best regards
> > Torquil Sørensen
> >
> > On 14/10/13 21:06, Yves Renard wrote:
> > > Dear Torquil,
> > >
> > > I just tried to include complex.h but it turns out that
> > > #include<complex.h>
> > > and
> > > #include<complex>
> > > are not compatible !
> > > It seems that it is not possible to include both. And since gmm
> > > includes <complex> it seems that this implies that it is incompatible
> > > with <complex.h>.
> > >
> > > I don't know how you can circumvent this. May be by using some
> > > namespaces ...
> > >
> > > Yves.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Torquil Macdonald Sørensen" <address@hidden>
> > > To: address@hidden
> > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:28:40 PM
> > > Subject: [Getfem-users] Conflict between GMM and LAPACKE
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > There seems to be a conflict between GMM and LAPACKE. The following
> > > test program does not compile with g++ 4.8.2 20131010 (prerelease):
> > >
> > > #include "lapacke.h"
> > > #include "gmm/gmm_matrix.h"
> > >
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > > return(0);
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > The compiler output is:
> > >
> > > ********************************************************
> > > In file included from
> > > /mn/anatu/cma-u3/tmac/usr/stow/gcc/include/c++/4.8.2/complex.h:36:0,
> > > from /mn/anatu/cma-u3/tmac/usr/include/lapacke.h:77,
> > > from conflict_gmm_lapacke.cpp:1:
> > > /mn/anatu/cma-u3/tmac/usr/include/gmm/gmm_matrix.h:67:35: error:
> > > expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘(’ token
> > > void add(const identity_matrix &I, const M &v1)
> > > ^
> > > In file included from conflict_gmm_lapacke.cpp:2:0:
> > > /mn/anatu/cma-u3/tmac/usr/include/gmm/gmm_matrix.h: In function ‘void
> > > gmm::add(const gmm::identity_matrix&)’:
> > > /mn/anatu/cma-u3/tmac/usr/include/gmm/gmm_matrix.h:68:30: error: ‘v1’
> > > was not declared in this scope
> > > { add(I, linalg_const_cast(v1)); }
> > > **********************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > > If I reverse the header file order, it compiles. lapacke.h seems to
> > > include "complex.h", which causes problems with gmm_matrix.h.
> > >
> > > Is this a bug in GMM, LAPACKE, or neither?
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Torquil Sørensen
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Getfem-users mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users