[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gforth] [IF] .. [ELSE] .. [THEN] implementation question

From: Josh Grams
Subject: Re: [gforth] [IF] .. [ELSE] .. [THEN] implementation question
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:27:45 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

> Anton Ertl wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Josh Grams wrote:
>>> In kernel/toolsext.fs, is there a reason why the definition of [ELSE] in
>>> [struct]-voc (at line 40) is not immediate?  All the others are...
>> There appears to be, because if I make it immediate, too, Gforth
>> breaks.  It's unclear to me what the reason is, though.  Maybe Bernd
>> can shed some light on it.
> As far as I can see, it is immediate, the immediate is just a line  
> below.

Argh! :)  So it is.  I guess the formatting threw me off: I didn't
notice that there was an `immediate` on the line above [IFDEF].

Sorry about that...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]