[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gforth] Gforth's fsl-util.*

From: Charles G Montgomery
Subject: Re: [gforth] Gforth's fsl-util.*
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:43:54 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

On Sunday 25 November 2012 11:00:22 AM Bernd Paysan wrote:
> ...
> AFAIK, we install the fsl-util.fth, because FSL loads that particular
> filename.  As we in Gforth don't use that file extension (we use
> .fs), we accidently duplicated the files...

I'm afraid I don't understand this.  While any Algorithm in the Forth 
Scientific Library should document clearly any dependence on things 
provided by fsl-util.* files, they shouldn't ever specify using a 
particular one. A distribution that provides a FSL version or FSL 
"harness" can of course specify a particular implementation of the 
features provided by fsl-util files.  But the Library itself is supposed 
to be independent of any such choice.

I'm just asking about this in case there is something on the FSL site 
that needs to be corrected.

regards   cgm

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]