Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy

[John Darrington]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:40:41PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
     
     I can sympathize with the rejection of institutionalized political
     correctness that (I think) Jos?????s message is about.  After all, the GHM
     audience is small and should be able to address problems through
     discussion, without resorting to a lawyer-jargon policy.

It is not so small.  If everyone who registered turns up we will have over 100 
people.
I think this is a record for GHM.  There could be many reasons for such a great 
response.
One possible reason, is that people decided to come after they saw we had this 
"policy".

I didn't write the text, but I think it is targeted not at the core hackers, 
who like
somebody said, know that we don't suffer from the problem to which it alludes.  
Instead,
it is for the benefit of people who have never before attended, in case such a 
problem is
endemic.   There have certainly been problems like it at some of the "open 
source" conferences.

     
     Yet, as Neal very well explained, the free software movement should be
     about inclusion.  When someone talks in public, they should seek to be
     welcoming to everyone in the audience.  Inserting ???explicit sexual
     language or imagery??? or ???comments related to gender, sexual 
orientation,
     disability??? etc. in a technical talk may amuse some, and exclude others.
     

I agree.  I didn't see that Jose said he intended to insert any of those things.
     

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.