[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore.
From: |
Anand Avati |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore. |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:06:54 +0530 |
>
> Performance is still way below NFS. I have turned on
> write-behind and read-ahead. And with fuse it's a little faster. but
> not significantly.
What is your IO pattern? what are the tests you are running? what is your
interconnect? NFS can provide really good re-read performance which you can
get out of glusterfs using io-cache on the client side.
Can we have a discussion on whether I'm heading in the right
> direction and what order things go in for the config files?
Can you paste your config files on pastebin and link it and also tell us the
kind of application/IOtests you are running?
thanks,
avati
--
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law.
-- Hofstadter's Law
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Performance question., (continued)
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Performance question., Kevan Benson, 2007/11/21
- [Gluster-devel] Re: AFR load-balancing, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2007/11/27
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Re: AFR load-balancing, Krishna Srinivas, 2007/11/27
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore., Hans Einar Gautun, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore., Chris Johnson, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore., Anand Avati, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore., Chris Johnson, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore., Anand Avati, 2007/11/16
Re: [Gluster-devel] Full bore.,
Anand Avati <=