[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking
From: |
Brian Taber |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:08:22 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.7 [CVS] |
I have been running Dovecot and Postfix with a 2 brick setup and posix
locking enabled on each brick for a while with no problems. This is a
Maildir setup... Dovecot is setup to use fcntl for locking.... remember
that gluster does not support flock as fuse does not support it...
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
>
>> Everything works fine as long as I don't introduce locking, which is
>> essential if one wishes to use the storage eg. as a backend for a mail
>> server.
>
> I'm sorry that I cannot answer your question, but do you have a choice in
> what mail server to use? Those that use the Maildir format (Like for
> example Postfix together with Courier-IMAP) does not need locking.
>
> Regards,
> Jerker Nyberg._______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
- [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Jerker Nyberg, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking,
Brian Taber <=
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Kevan Benson, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Brian Taber, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Brian Taber, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Brian Taber, 2007/11/30
- Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2007/11/30
Re: [Gluster-devel] distributed locking, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2007/11/30