|
From: | matthew zeier |
Subject: | Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ? |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:44:33 -0800 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) |
Matthias Saou wrote:
Maybe a silly question, then, but what is the namespace useful for in that example, then?
Just for this part: volume bricks type cluster/unify subvolumes afr1 afr2 option scheduler rr option namespace brick-ns option rr.limits.min-free-disk 5% end-volume But you're right - brick-ns isn't redundant.Perhaps that example should be cleaned up? I know I was confused about it too.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |