[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?
From: |
Sebastien COUPPEY |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:22:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:43:09PM +0530, Anand Avati wrote:
> the article is right. AFR itself does intelligent failover. and you do not
> need a namespace unless you use unify.
So in this example, if brik1 is down the namespace is down and nothing
is available ?
>
> avati
>
> 2008/1/10, Sebastien COUPPEY <address@hidden>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Understanding_AFR_Translator
> >
> > the cluster example starting at : Clustered Mode
> > does't seems to me to be redundant as if the brick1 goes down, the
> > namespace is not available anymore and the files are also not
> > available anymore.
> >
> > Am I wrong ?
> >
> > Thanks
>
Re: [Gluster-devel] is the wiki cluster afr example correct ?,
Sebastien COUPPEY <=