[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Re: webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace
From: |
Sascha Ottolski |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Re: webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:46:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
Am Samstag 19 Januar 2008 14:16:31 schrieb Sascha Ottolski:
> For me, I'm only serving small static image files that live on a
> gluster mount. And find it strange and unexpected that apache1
> outperforms apache2, nginx and lighttpd so significantly...
I just found out something, may be this sheds some light on the
situation: I had "use epoll;" configured for nginx. If comment it out,
the request/second increase by almost 50%. It's still worse than
apache, but getting closer after all.
May also be useful: If I disable "sendfile", performance drops again. If
I configure 4 instead of only 1 workers, performance also drops.
Cheers, Sascha
- [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Anand Avati, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Anand Avati, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Anand Avati, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Angel, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/20