Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS-1.4 to become GlusterFS-2.0

[Dan Parsons]

In my install of 1.4rc7, /sbin/mount.glusterfs is a simple shell  
script, and glusterfs is actually a symlink to glusterfsd. So, in  
short, I'd have to say that in 1.4rc7, yes, the client and server are  
one binary.


Dan Parsons


On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Kevan Benson wrote:

> Sean Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Kevan Benson  
> > <address@hidden>wrote:
> > > Anand Babu Periasamy wrote:
> > > > 2.0.0rc1 will be available in a week. Before we call it 2.0.0, we  
> > > > want to
> > > > to achieve the following:
> > > > * Binary packages for GNU/Linux (rpm/deb), FreeBSD, Mac OS X and  
> > > > Solaris
> > > > (server)
> > > As for the RPM spec file, are you amenable to some alterations?   
> > > IMO it
> > > would be preferable to build three packages instead of one,
> > > glusterfs-common, glusterfs-client and glusterfs-server, following  
> > > the
> > > common way client/server packages are built in RHEL/CentOS.
> > >
> > > I remember Matt's spec file used to be this way, but it looks like  
> > > you
> > > guys specifically changed it:
> > >
> > > * Sat Apr 19 2008 Amar Tumballi <address@hidden> - 1.3.8pre6
> > > - Merged common, client and server packages into one package.
> > >
> > > Is there a reason for that?
> > Aren't client and server now one executable?  I think so.
>
> Nope.  At least not in 1.4rc7.
>
> /sbin/mount.glusterfs
> /usr/sbin/glusterfs
> /usr/sbin/glusterfsd
>
> --
>
> -Kevan Benson
> -A-1 Networks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel