[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog doc/C/sources.xml

From: strk
Subject: Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog doc/C/sources.xml
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:07:45 +0200

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:01:07AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> Udo Giacomozzi wrote:

> > Agree. I personally don't care about the release details, but I'd like
> > that we all agree on priorities. It's pointless to fiddle with tiny
> > details (TimelineInfo) when the render fails on simple rendering
> > tasks.
>   The TimelineInfo changes caused almost more trouble for this release
> than it was worth. We should continue to improve both the quality and
> performance of all the renderers Gnash uses. I totally appreciate the
> energy and time you have put into the AGG renderer. My wanting to use GL
> as the default for source builds is not meant to slight AGG at all. I'm
> just trying to reduce the incoming stupid bug reports.

Don't bring TimelineInfo in or the discussion will never end :)

I belive what Udo meant by "fails on simple rendering tasks" is what
happens with opengl.
OpenGL backend does not even expose the required interfaces to make
automated testing work, this is the only reason for 'make check' to 
succeed when building with OGL renderer.
It's not just "quality", it's "correctness".


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]