[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_f

From: Rob Savoye
Subject: Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:34:46 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 09/07/11 10:24, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> Would you accept this way of taking decisions or do you want to decide
> by yourself ? Or would you prefer unanimity ? We could even get unanimity
> if we accepted to discuss this w/out bias.

 As the Gnash maintainer, I only make a decision when we can't come to
consensus. Normally, that waits till a disagreement goes on for a long
period of time... In this particular case, I will agree to letting you
change the FB GUI back to 'auto', although I dislike 'auto'. I won't
personally make this change, as I prefer the current behavior.

  As far as double buffering goes, I just created a task (#11337) to
reimplement this in the near future. While some may consider this a
regression, I don't as all the FB code has changed heavily, and it was a
"feature" that nobody used anyway. Lets do ourselves a favor and stop
arguing over it.

        - rob -

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]