[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_fi

From: Bastiaan Jacques
Subject: Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2092-g36b1a2f
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 15:37:40 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)

On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, Richard Wilbur wrote:

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Bastiaan Jacques <address@hidden> wrote:

On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Richard Wilbur wrote:

Because I simply overlooked it. Well spotted!

Glad to help!  Wish I could help with more code contributions.

I presume the main reason for not changing the other objects presently
passed by const reference is that they aren't movable?

Only one object is passed to this particular constructor, that I can

You're right concerning this constructor.  I was referring to several
subsequent constructors in the patch [...]

In that case, the answer to your question is yes.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]