[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_fi
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2092-g36b1a2f
Tue, 3 Jun 2014 15:37:40 +0200 (CEST)
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, Richard Wilbur wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Bastiaan Jacques <address@hidden> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Richard Wilbur wrote:
Because I simply overlooked it. Well spotted!
Glad to help! Wish I could help with more code contributions.
I presume the main reason for not changing the other objects presently
passed by const reference is that they aren't movable?
Only one object is passed to this particular constructor, that I can
You're right concerning this constructor. I was referring to several
subsequent constructors in the patch [...]
In that case, the answer to your question is yes.