[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al

From: strk
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 02:21:01 +0200

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:32:29PM +0200, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
> On Saturday 22 April 2006 16:44, Rob Savoye wrote:
> > As you dig deeper, you'll see lots of ugly code 
> > using structs instead of classes, and other non C++ things. I've been 
> > trying to change things to be more real C++ when I can.
> I've done this for a little class in Movie.h. Would you take a look at
> the attached patch and let me know if that's how you'd like to see things
> done in the future? (And of course you can commit it, if you like.)

I've given a quick read of your patch. It surely looks more C++ then
it is, but maybe, if the import_info is really just an helper class
of Movie as comments say, it could be an all-privates with Movie as a friend.
What do others think ? 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]