Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: shared pointers

[Markus Gothe]

'extern "C" {
double x = (double)roundl((double)y);
}'

should do.

Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Rob Savoye wrote:
>> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>> Rob Savoye wrote:
>>>> Markus Gothe wrote:
>>>>> GCC is a gnuism with it's own non-iso extensions, not a real compiler
>>>>> for except x86-based systems imo. ;)
>>> Honestly, I was hoping Rob will tell us the truth about it :-)
>>   Actually, since I avoid using the extensions,
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> what's left is a nicely ANSI conforming C++ compiler,
>> especially if you use the newer 4.x version.
> 
> Right.
> The only think that's missing for me is to get rid of problem described
> here (casting pointer-to-function to pointer-to-object, and vice versa):
> 
> http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2004/12/problem-with-dlsym/
> 
> but this problem applies to C++ Standard than to particular compiler.
> But GCC could be nice and fix it even then :-)
> 
>> I find this statement amusing, as for many years most people
>> thought it worked better on all the non x86 architectures. :-) The x86
>> really only started to catch up with GCC 3.x.
>>
>>   Personally, it's VC++ that I find obnoxious, as it doesn't even really
>> support the ANSI C++ spec.
> 
> I found Visual C++ 2005 as well supporting ANSI C++.
> However, it's a crap because does not support C99.
> 
> Here is my (mloskot) story and funny replies from MS :-)
> 
> http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=259043&SiteID=1
> 
> Cheers

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature