[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?

From: Martin Guy
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] "unsinged": enumeral type?
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:46:56 +0000

Isn't the compiler referenceing the expression, not the return?
Because path_cmd_move_to is a enum and m_cmd is not?

Yes. the compiler may implement enums as unsigned [int] or it may
choose a smaller type if it wishes. It could use bitfields if it
 If you know that the path_cmd_move_to value is an enum that only
takes positive values (it will if no explicit values are given for the
enum values) and that just using the value of p_c_m_t is ok in that
context, the fix would be

   return (m_vertex == 2) ? (unsigned)path_cmd_move_to : m_cmd;

"unsigned == "unsigned int" ??


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]