[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build

From: Patrice Dumas
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:22:21 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:41:33PM +0100, strk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:23:15PM +0100, strk wrote:
> I tracked this down to macros/libtool.m4 not matching the version
> of 'libtool' I have on this machine.
> So, if we use 'libtoolize --copy --force', thus replacing the
> file, we should as well update macros/libtool.m4, or completely drop
> it so that the system one is used.
> Alternatively, we should *not* run libtoolize ?

I think we shouldn't have libtool.m4, (nor libltdl) in cvs, 
but rather use the system ones, and then when Rob does a release he would 
use the newest one. But as long they are in cvs, maybe running libtoolize 
isn't wise.

To be more precise, I think that it would be better to remove libltdl 
completly from cvs and run:
libtoolize --copy --force --ltdl
But some people allready started modifying libltdl, so it is not obvious 
what to do now.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]