[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance p
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 May 2007 13:39:02 +0200 |
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:26:54PM +0200, Udo Giacomozzi wrote:
> Hello Sandro,
>
> Tuesday, May 8, 2007, 12:30:48 PM, you wrote:
> SS> *not* the _scriptTransformed and the _dynamicallyCreated flag.
>
> SS> If what Zou is saying in IRC is correct it should only use
> _scriptTransformed
> SS> instead:
>
> Isn't a dynamically created sprite instance by definition a script
> "transformed" one too?
I dunno, till we have a testcase which anyone with a proprietary player
can run to verify the expected behaviour.
I've given current code a look and found that the *only* place in which
get_accept_anim_move is called is inside DisplayList::move_display_object.
This mean we only use it for PlaceObject2 with MOVE flag on *and*
any call to sprite_instance::add_display_object() if the target
depth is already occupied (sic.).
Sorry, gnash code in this part is still really confusing..
--strk;
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), (continued)
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/08
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/08
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/08
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem),
Sandro Santilli <=
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/09
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/09
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/10
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10
Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/10
Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/10
Re[4]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/10