[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] Adobe Patents RTMP

From: Markus Gothe
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] Adobe Patents RTMP
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:36:38 +0100

Patenting a protocol, well well I might patent an eternity machine as well then ;)

I don't think this is an issue, at least not for EU Citizens. So we might wanna move the domain and the machines to a .eu... *Sight* Any clues of the implications of this?


On 20 Mar 2008, at 14:39, Rob Savoye wrote:
Steven Gong wrote:
We have discussed this issue in Red5 community already. The result seems
that it will only violate the patent if one creates both the client and the
server. I believe this is not true for both Red5 and gnash. But I am not a
lawyer of course. Forgive me if I was wrong. :-)

 We have both a client and a server, although the RTMP implementation
in Cygnal & Gnash is over a year old. The patent is a few days old.

- rob -

Gnash-dev mailing list

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]