[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] remoting

From: strk
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] remoting
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:52:19 +0200

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:45:17AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> strk wrote:
> >
> >Agreed. It's just the "replace" idea I'm against.
> >Adding RTMP is good.
> >Best if keeping the IOChannel abstraction for final use.
>   Ideally, yes. Abstractions like that are usually good, although 
> IOChannel may need to evolve some to support the 64 I/O channels used in 
> a single RTMP connection, plus to handle sending Camera and Microphone 
> AMF objects to a server.

Could they be up to 64 distinct IOChannel instances obtained from an RTMP
client handle ?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]