[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity

From: strk
Subject: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:58:34 +0100

Due to recent discussion with Rob, this mail is
to get a shared interpretation of the Severity 
field we have for bugs:

1. Wish
2. Minor
3. Normal
4. Important
5. Blocker
6. Security

So far I've always used 'Security' for memory violations 
or (more rarely) for privacy violation behaviours.

"Blocker" I've used mostly to mean "release blocker",
that is something you should fix before next release.

"Important" is something people will be likely to complain
a lot about (say support for latest YouTube change).

Normal and down I dubt we have strong arguments about.

So, what do other think about those definition ?


  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]