[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
pending/538: GNATS should support relative date queries (pending)
From: |
bug-gnats |
Subject: |
pending/538: GNATS should support relative date queries (pending) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:25:01 -0600 (CST) |
>Number: 538
>Category: pending
>Synopsis: GNATS should support relative date queries
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: gnats-admin
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 15 09:25:01 -0600 2005
>Originator: Ed Jaffe
>Release: v4.1.0
>Organization:
Phoenix Software International
>Environment:
Linux for zSeries
>Description:
GNATS should allow a date query relative to the current date. I understand I
can query with an expression that includes an explicit date, but such queries
make little sense when saved.
For example, I might wish to see every PR that arrived today. If I construct a
query using today's date and save it, I can't use the same query tomorrow to
show me the PRs that arrived that day. Instead, I have to construct a new query
each day.
I'd like to be able to specify a date like "-5" -- meaning five days prior to
today ("-0" could mean today).
Chad Walstrom points out that the use of descriptive time units similar to
at(1) would probably be preferable:
<Quote>
The equivalent line in at(1) would be: "at now - COUNT TIME_UNITS" or "at now -
5 days". In addition to the "now" alias, there are "yesterday", "tomorrow",
and "midnight", "noon", and even "teatime". Time units can be "minutes",
"hours", "days", or "weeks". To translate that into query-pr syntax:
$ query-pr --expr 'Arrival-Date="today"'
or
$ query-pr --expr 'Arrival-Date<"now - 3 hours"
</Quote>
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Unformatted:
>Quarter:
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- pending/538: GNATS should support relative date queries (pending),
bug-gnats <=