Re: [Gneuralnetwork] license of the documentation [was: documentation]

[Ivan F. V. B.]

* Jean Michel Sellier <address@hidden> [2016-03-23 19:33]:
> 2016-03-23 19:13 GMT+01:00 Ivan F. V. B. <address@hidden>:

> > [... see below]
> > What do you think on licensing the documentation under the CC-BY-SA 4.0?

> If we have to write a proper documentation for a GNU package it will be
> under GFDL. There is no other way to proceed in my opinion. But many thanks
> for doing this search.

I understand from your answer that any GNU package has to publish its
documentation under the GFDL, please correct me if not.

Then, given your answer, and also for logical reasons, I must keep the
premise under close scrutiny: must GNeuralNetwork be a GNU package, and
why?

Side node: I love the FSF and even more its principles, specially
materialized in the GPL, but not all of the FSF is good. The GPL is
great though and one reason that has attracted me to this project.

Ivan F. V. B.