gnewsense-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Questions on the update system


From: aurelien
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Questions on the update system
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:06:45 +0200

On sam, 2009-08-01 at 10:37 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens wrote:
> aurelien wrote:
> > On sam, 2009-08-01 at 10:16 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens wrote:
> >> Hello Aurelien,
> >>
> >> this update will not delete the 2.6.30 kernel. It will only replace the
> >> 2.6.24 by another 2.6.24.
> >>
> >> ben
> >>
> >> aurelien wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The update system alert me that there's update for the system.
> >>> It want to update kernel 2.6.30.3 > 2.6.24.24
> >>>
> >>> The system alert don't look by itself on sort of compare way ?
> >>> Or the update alert system estimate that it's dangerous to use another
> >>> kernel than itself ?
> >>>
> >>> aurelien
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gNewSense-dev mailing list
> >>> address@hidden
> >>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
> >>>
> > 
> > Hello Ben,
> > 
> > Thanks for your help !
> > 
> > But why the module update manager don't understand by it self that is
> > not necessary ?
> > Or there is an interest ?
> > 
> > aurelien
> 
> Of course there is an interest: avoid security holes in your operating
> system.
> The update manager will update ALL the packages on your system,
> independent of the question whether you use them or not. If you want to
> avoid this, you must remove the unused packages or set them to "hold" in
> the package manager. Both of these do NOT make any sense in your case.
> Just let the system update the 2.6.24. It won't do any harm.
> 
> ben

Hello Ben,

I don't want to remove the update packages mangager (certainly not).
i just want to knows why is not able to understant that the last kernel
must be certainly better than an older. 2.6.30.3 > 2.6.24.

aurele





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]