[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Bug #35790 (fop related) and the way of fixing it
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Bug #35790 (fop related) and the way of fixing it |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:09:09 +1100 |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, 21:34:00 LHST, Marek Buras <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:54:36PM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > If you could double check and make sure there is an explicit licence
> > statement - pd or not - that would be excellent. Would be embarassing
> > to make the package not free by mistake :)
> >
>
> I couldn't find any licensing information about this file (besides the
> comment inside it), but I've sent an e-mail to Graeme Gill - the author
> - asking about it and permission to use it.
>
> > As long as the profiles are under a compatible licence you should be
> > fine. Note that being a repack it'll need the +fsdg suffix and the
> > copyright info updated with your changes.
>
> What kind of copyright information should it be? Is something like this:
> ---------- 8< -----------
> Files: /path/to/this/sRGB.icm
> License: Public domain (if it's PD indeed)
> This file has been downloaded from ...
> ---------- 8< -----------
>
in the licence bit include the email from upstream where they say its pd,
otherwise pretty muvh that :)