[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled
From: |
Sam Geeraerts |
Subject: |
[Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:47:39 +0100 |
Op Fri, 01 Feb 2013 06:20:19 +0100
schreef Marek Buras <address@hidden>:
> Is modifying patched Debian sources for the
> kernel good idea at all or should we use linux-libre-2.6.32 and then
> apply some critical patches to it?
The first option is what we have now. It needs to be done once per
release and maintenance is a matter of modifying new Debian patches
when they come out.
The second option means we'd have to mold linux-libre into Debian
packages and stay of top of security issues ourselves.
Both are a lot of work, but the second is more work than the first. Our
current implementation is imperfect (e.g. r8169 doesn't work), but I
don't see the advantage of choosing the second option.
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] [bug #38001] Kernel metapackages (linux-latest-2.6) refer to missing Debian kernel versions, Marek Buras, 2013/02/01
- [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled,
Sam Geeraerts <=
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Marek Buras, 2013/02/05
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Sam Geeraerts, 2013/02/06
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Sam Geeraerts, 2013/02/19
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Marek Buras, 2013/02/23
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Sam Geeraerts, 2013/02/23
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Marek Buras, 2013/02/24
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] r8169 module is disabled, Sam Geeraerts, 2013/02/24