Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments

[Ted Smith]

On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 07:11 +0100, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -
wrote:
> Ted Smith wrote:
> >> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:01 +0000
> >> Eric Morey <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I found this post and comments on Vrms to interesting:
> >>> http://blog.nizarus.org/2009/09/are-you-a-100-free-user
> >>>
> >>> Eric...
> > 
> nice one ted
> > 
> > RMS would certainly not agree with (much of) this output.
> 
> some guy called ompaul made a comment about it on the web page pointing 
> out that we kind of IGNORE IT COMPLETELY but it seems he was wrong.. ;-)
> 
> MOST of us ignore it. ;-)
> 
Actually, there's a long history (going back to Gobuntu) of trying to
reform VRMS. It's never really taken off. 

All it would take is a small bit of ubuntu-ization to make the behavior
correct in Ubuntu (which uses the FSF designation of freedom) and
gNewSense. Nobody wants to write the perl code, I guess. ;-)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part