[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OR fix the prefix of eachmessage header
From: |
leos |
Subject: |
Re: OR fix the prefix of eachmessage header |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Apr 2002 20:51:33 +0300 |
Dear Karl,
Thank you for your interesting comments...
>>
>> ==========================================
>> Jochen Schnapka Re: <some subject description>
>> ==========================================
>As far as I can see, you're using M$Outlook. You should able to change
>which columns are displayed for each message. Try right-clicking on the
>column headings, perhaps?
What I can't understand is why many people here try to teach others
with basical things and press them in their way of work. Why many
people don't believe that others can have their good reasons for
doing things their ways?
Yes I did use M$OL just for the last message as every recipient could
see (e.g. now I use different way) but it is not important. Do you
really believe that it is very senseful to include next "To:" column
because of 1% of messages that you propose to identify that way?
>> Are some 3 characters of the prefix so high tax to be unacceptable?
>On most systems, you can have the system sort the mail for you, e.g. by
>using procmail. Or use scoring techniques in mutt. Lots.
Again the same problem: teaching.. ;)) I thought we were not discussing
how to sort or distribute messages (that everybody knows) but how to
identify them convenient way for everyone, weren't we? What I need is
getting a fast visual orientation in one chronolically sorted list.
Hence not subject sorting or including additional columns or beaking
the list in many partial boxes.
That's why I asked owners to add some 3-char identification prefix.
I still believe it is acceptable for everyone.
Regards,
Dr Leos.
"leos.vcf
Description: Card for <leos@qualitynet.net>
- Re: OR fix the prefix of eachmessage header,
leos <=