Re: gnokii daemon, etc

[Carlos Fernandez Sanz]

I don't need a full AT command set implementation. As a matter of fact, as
long as I can send SMS' as quickly as the cell phone can take them it's fine
with me - at least initially I don't plan to emulate a modem, but just
implement a small device driver that takes the SMS data in a plain text
format (something as trivial as number:text\n would be fine) and sends it
through the cell phone.

BTW I bought a Siemens C-45 only to find out that the data cable and the
power supply share the same plug, therefore you can't keep the phone plugged
and use the data cable at the same time, which renders it useless for me. So
I'm sticking with my old 3310, it's got no AT command set but still...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pawel Kot" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 21:58
Subject: Re: gnokii daemon, etc


> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
>
> > I'm using a Nokia 3310 for testing but I could probably get any other
model.
> > Anyway how's that relevant for what I want to do? (except that if I had
an
> > AT enabled model my problem would be trivially resolved :-)).
>
> Well, this exception is a big difference. Most of the modern phones have
> AT commands support.
>
> Dunno who is planning to enhance gnokiid support. If we had maintaner for
> gnokiid then, sure why not. If you volunteer to do this I may offer you
> some help with this. And it will be much work -- to get this into the
> maintainable state AT commands parser needs to be rewritten.
>
> pkot
> --
> mailto:address@hidden :: mailto:address@hidden
> http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnokii-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnokii-users
>