Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses

[Pawel Kot]

>>> address@hidden 24 February 2003 20:07:44 >>>
> Actually half of my statemachine problems would be solved by having
a
> real sm_block_no_retry(). Not having one was the reason that I wrote
> expect_message() (though the real issue was not as clear for me at
that
> time than it is now). So if the statemachine gets a function that
never
> retries, I only need to add a sm_block_many().

Okay. I'm still thinking of the best way to do sm_block_many().

> It can reside in nk3110 code if you don't want it cluttering
> gsm-statemachine.c.

I want it there.

> Let's do this way: I'll soon submit a small-ish patch that fixes
some
> uncontroversial stuff in the 3110 SMS code. After the statemachine
is
> fixed and the TEXT encoding is in place, I'll submit more 3110 code
that
> is relevant for those issues. Thus you can disregard my two latest
3110
> patches. They were just examples of how things could be done if the
> infrastructure is not fixed.

Okay. But I won't disregard them. I'll write something based on your
sm_block_many()

pkot