[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Call and SMS Notification

From: Fred Lefévère-Laoide
Subject: Re: Call and SMS Notification
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:05:51 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080213)

Am I missing something ?

In the example (gnokii-extras/snippets/monitor/waitcall.c), after the call gn_sm_functions(GN_OP_SetCallNotification
there is a loop with gn_call_check_active(state);

Is it mandatory if the call notification is accepted by the driver ?

When I look at the sources, I don't see any select on the BT socket after setting the notification ...

Any help would be much appreciated ...



Fred Lefévère-Laoide a écrit :
Daniele Forsi a écrit :
On Friday 28 March 2008, 12:13:30, Fred wrote:

I tried replacing AT+CLCC=1 by AT+CCWA=1 in atgen.c/steCallNotification
and I get no error but no callback either ...

I don't know about SE W880i with unmodified libgnokii since you didn't post the relevant part of debug log, but SE Z310i replies to AT+CPAS with just "+CRING: " while we were expecting "+CRING: VOICE"
see the fix I just committed with atgen.c,v 1.179

It replies to +CCWA=1 with +CRING: VOICE
But gnokii doesn't see anything although hyperterminal see it ...

I'll try +CPAS ...

the error with AT+CLCC=1 is a minor problem because the phone stays in what is its default state (since ATZ is sent as first command) which with some phones is ok

Pawel, I would change it to just AT+CLCC because Sony-Ericsson docs (dg_at_2006--07_r3a.pdf) state that "1" means "notifiy incoming data calls" while we only check for VOICE, but the docs don't specify what happens without arguments; from my tests both SE Z310i and Nokia 5300 always notify voice calls, with AT+CLCC=1 and with AT+CLCC

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]