[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: public arch archive of emacs available
From: |
Robert Anderson |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: public arch archive of emacs available |
Date: |
03 Sep 2003 09:44:50 -0700 |
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:57:40AM -0700, Robert Anderson wrote:
> > Looks like you haven't added the info directory to the arch tree?
>
> Yeah, for now just do `mkdir info'.
>
> The reason I didn't put it in the tree is because it's in =tagging-method as
> a non-source directory (since that's what it is). Really the emacs makefile
> should just do the mkdir itself.
Getting closer...
$ make bootstrap
...
Loading cus-face (source)...
Loading faces (source)...
Lists of integers (garbage collection statistics) are normal output
while building Emacs; they do not indicate a problem.
((85454 . 20991) (5099 . 22) (539 . 74) 320398 26991 (10 . 1) (17 . 0)
(6490 . 881))
Cannot open load file: loaddefs.el
make[1]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rwa/oss/emacs--cvs-trunk/+build/src'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
$ touch lisp/loaddefs.el
seemed to do the trick. Something else for the Makefile, perhaps. If
this is a generated file, why is it versioned in CVS? (perhaps it also
serves as a cache?)
Carrying on...
$ make bootstrap
...
Loading files (source)...
Loading cus-face (source)...
Loading faces (source)...
Lists of integers (garbage collection statistics) are normal output
while building Emacs; they do not indicate a problem.
((85454 . 20991) (5099 . 22) (539 . 74) 320398 26991 (10 . 1) (17 . 0)
(6490 . 881))
Loading loaddefs.el (source)...
((85456 . 20989) (5099 . 22) (539 . 74) 320268 26991 (10 . 1) (17 . 0)
(6491 . 880))
Loading simple (source)...
Symbol's function definition is void: define-minor-mode
make[1]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rwa/oss/emacs--cvs-trunk/+build/src'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
That might be a genuine current sources bug, but I'm not sure.
Bob