[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: DARCS

From: Bruce Stephens
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: DARCS
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 23:38:45 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Ethan Benson <address@hidden> writes:


> {arch} and .arch-ids are no worse then CVS and SVN and BitKeeper all
> over the place.  arch is better even since .arch-ids is hidden from
> standard lists, and never bothers greps and typical finds.
> the only annoyance for me is the pristine trees in {arch} which
> screw up rgrep.  but ive heard tom say he wanted to kill pristine
> trees anyway, so that may well solve itself.

I agree, it's mostly the pristine trees that have caught me out.
.arch-ids annoy me because they're the wrong way to do explicit tags;
in practical terms they've not been a problem, I just need to remember
to tag files before renaming them (when using tagline).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]