[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems

From: Miles Bader
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems
Date: 08 Sep 2003 11:52:22 +0900

Shlomi Fish <address@hidden> writes:
> > "File and Directories Copies"
> >
> > Arch doesn't do this because it's considered a bad idea. Trying to
> > merge across a one-to-many copy of this form would be insanely
> > complicated.
> Fine. Regardless, it doesn't have this feature, which some people
> (including I) find useful.

I'm curious how you use this, and what advantages you see compared to
just copying the source file/dir.  Do you consider it just an efficiency
hack when copying something, or do you actually take advantage of the
nature of the copy somehow?

The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
  --Albert Einstein

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]