[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Syst

From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:56:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:14:00PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Shlomi Fish <address@hidden> writes:
> > > For that matter, what semantic value is there for maintaining a "history"
> > > of a clone of a file?  It's a new file with a new purpose.
> > 
> > For merging and for tracking changes to previous versions of the file?
> Note that in arch there isn't any real concept of a file history log --
> you have to construct one by examining the logs of changesets which
> affected the file.

Oh geez, it makes sense when you think of it as an svn bug.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgpATwWRjazlV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]