[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems

From: Jonas Diemer
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:24:45 +0200

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:58:24 +0300 (IDT)
Shlomi Fish <address@hidden> wrote:

> For merging and for tracking changes to previous versions of the file?
> It's also less resource-hungry, time-consuming and space-consuming.
I believe you are thinking to subversionish now... I would suggest you
choose your categories a bit differently, comparing revision control
tasks rather than technical stuff... In a software developers mind
(using a scm) copying files at the repository level doesn't make any
sense, until you put a meaning in it, as the svn manual states. One
meaning is, to create a branch. arch has different means for that
purpose (and other svn copy uses).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]