[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:32:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 07:14:53PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:13:42PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> >> I find the use of filenames starting with = (which must be escaped in
> >> bash) and + (which confuses many editors) far more difficult and
> >> annoying.
> >
> > Are there really editors other than elvis and nvi which are confused
> > by filenames starting with a + ?
>
> Yes. Emacs, for one. It may even be a defined convention somewhere
> that `$EDITOR +<n> <file>' ought to go to line <n> of <file> in one's
> favourite editor.
XEmacs at least has no trouble with it. I don't know if GNU Emacs is
broken in this respect.
This opens file "foo" at line 1:
gnuclient +1 foo
This opens file "+1":
gnuclient +1
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
pgpHYrQayzz0o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?,
Andrew Suffield <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, John Goerzen, 2003/09/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Utterly painless arch?, Neil Stevens, 2003/09/09