[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ANN: Linux Kernel Arch Repository

From: Tupshin Harper
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ANN: Linux Kernel Arch Repository
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:54:39 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2

John Goerzen wrote:

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 01:16:19PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote:
Wonderful. Do you have any plans to use the BK changeset level of granularity for recent BK managed kernels instead of just the releases that are posted to The CVS and SVN exported versions of the BitKeeper trees include this information, so you wouldn't need to use BK in order to get the info.

I would like to do that.  I'm not sure I trust bk -> cvs -> arch since cvs
doesn't really have a notion of changesets.  I did look into the Subversion
gateway, but every time I tried to access, I got a connection
refused message.  Do you happen to know if the Subversion gateway moved?
The subversion server was down yesterday, bu is currently back up and accessible at (I just did an update). Apparently, the subversion repository is actually generated from the CVS one, but it uses the CVS timestamp to generate a changeset based on date of commit, so working off of either the CVS or SVN one should be equally reliable, though it might be easier to use svn since they have already done the changeset generation work. If you don't mind reproducing that work yourself, the CVS one might be preferable since it is updated quicker and is more directly maintained by BiMover.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]