[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans
|
From: |
Florian Weimer |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:07:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> So there's a cost/benefit question here and what I'm wondering (and
> taking as a hypothesis) is that the untagged-source foo is ample here.
I think some support for the .cvsignore industry standard would be a
nice addition. It could be an option for tree-lint, and it would just
print the discrepancies betweenn CVS' view and tla's.
The full tagging-method generalization starts to look like
overengineering to me, too.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/16