Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>

    > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 05:18, Tom Lord wrote:
    > > But good examples of why I'm wrong with that hypothesis are welcome,
    > > of course.

    > A java project, that wants to treat .class (.o) files as excluded, but
    > also recieves some .class files from elsewhere to link into jars - but
    > without the source. They may even be arbitrarily mixed in amongst the
    > code they have source for, and unable to split them out via configs.

But untagged-source does a pretty good job with that, no?  Those class
files which are tagged are source, those that aren't are something
else.

-t