[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans

From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:56:41 +1000

On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 07:53, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > A java project, that wants to treat .class (.o) files as excluded, but
>     > also recieves some .class files from elsewhere to link into jars - but
>     > without the source. They may even be arbitrarily mixed in amongst the
>     > code they have source for, and unable to split them out via configs.
> But untagged-source does a pretty good job with that, no?  Those class
> files which are tagged are source, those that aren't are something
> else.

Thats one reason I use explicit all the time. Consider a tagline using
tree, where source -> names? (or does untagged-source work there as


GPG key available at: <>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]