[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:01:38 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:56:08PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> > So there's a cost/benefit question here and what I'm wondering (and
> > taking as a hypothesis) is that the untagged-source foo is ample here.
> I must admit that I can't see at all how untagged-source (useful though it
> is) has any connection with directory-specific regexp matching...

Oh, wait, I think I see what you're saying: people could mark untagged
files as being ignored or something instead of putting them in a regexp.

I really don't think that works for me though -- I _want_ untagged files to
be flagged as errors, because I often forget to add tags (obviously with
emacs, where new files can come from CVS, but also with my personal

We live, as we dream -- alone....

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]