Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id

[Dustin Sallings]

On Friday, Sep 19, 2003, at 06:59 US/Pacific, Bruce Stephens wrote:

> > In this case I think deviating from CVS is probably better. CVS
> > never got branching right, and that's one of the things tla is
> > really good at.  At the same time, "tagging" a file to have a
> > particular string at the end makes perfect sense. "tagging" a
> > category to a new archive is much less intuitive.
>
> Probably all true.  That suggests removing "tla tag", and replacing it
> with "tla branch".

	I think this makes sense.  Conceptually, it was a small hurdle to 
cross to understand that ``tla tag'' would give me the ability to pull 
the current state of a project in someone else's archive into my own 
and let me start editing.

	Perhaps we should add a ``label'' concept and just get rid of ``tag'' 
altogether.

--
Dustin Sallings