[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:48:54 -0700 (PDT)

    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>

    > BTW, is it alright to use `tag' to create _occasional_ tagged
    > versions in branch, e.g., base-0 = tag, patch-1 = patch, patch-2
    > = patch, patch-3 = tag, ...?  This seems convenient in some
    > cases, but I vaguely recall a warning against it somewhere.

If you grok patch-logs and their relation to whats-missing and the
merging commands, then you qualify for a license to tag in otherwise
simple development branched versions.  In the state of California
there is a small fee and a multiple-choice test -- I'm not sure how
they handle it in Japan.

However, I wonder if in 9/10 of your occaisional cases, you wouldn't
rather `get' the thing you would tag, `sync-tree' with the version you
want to commit to, then commit.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]