[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so go
From: |
Alexander Deruwe |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:29:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:11:20PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Stig Brautaset <address@hidden> writes:
> > There's an option to push-mirror to not mirror cached revisions, so you
> > can have the best of both worlds. :)
>
> Actually, that doesn't help at all, it's an entirely orthogonal problem.
>
> The problem I'm having has to do with whether using a cached revision is
> the best thing for a _user_ of an archive, which varies depending on the
> user's environment (plus details of the source tree involved), not the
> server's.
If that user mirrors your archive with --no-cache, she can decide for
herself where to place the cached revisions. I think maybe that is what
Stig meant. If that user just uses your archive, then yes, it doesn't
help.
Alexander
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Collins, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Collins, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Collins, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good,
Alexander Deruwe <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Collins, 2003/09/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24