[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch

From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:18:10 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:14:18AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:39:46AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > And how is it functionally different from the explicit tagging method?
> the difference is that this way I don't need to think about it and all
> the discussions about what method is better or about these tagging
> issues will vanish. the whole tagging methods will go away.


> You have to remember to always put 'tla' before mv, cp, rm (mkdir
> probably too) etc.. But I find this strict behaviour as a feature. I
> don't want to risk to checkin a tree where I inserted garbage by
> mistake.

...but that's a description of explicit. Again, I do not see how you
think this is different.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]