[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch

From: Davide Libenzi
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:51:28 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 30 Sep 2003, Miles Bader wrote:

> Davide Libenzi <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > Personally I do see some of Andrea points. I'm using explicit tagging
> > > > because, like Andrea, I do want to commit strictly.
> > >
> > > What is the source of this canard?  What does "strict commits" have to
> > > do with explicit tagging?  Please explain your thought process.
> >
> > I do fairly often use-and-trash C (or Perl or whatever) test source
> > files that are used to test something and that I do not want to be
> > included in my commits.
> ... so use `tagline; untagged-source junk'
> result: files random are not committed unless you explicit tag them (via
> `tila add' or by adding a tagline).

I know, but what's the point of having tagline for me ? I will never use
the tag-line: inside my sources and I will always require an add-tag with
my usage pattern. Look, I'm not saying to nuke tagline. I'm just saying
that tagline+tricks == explicit for me.

- Davide

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]