[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:38:49 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
> In all the revisions there's a ,,patchset directory. I'm not sure if it's
> of any use. The way I build the revisions using arch_replay_list doesnt
> leave behind any ,,patchet dir. In fact I think it's an error and that it
> should not be there.
> Am I right? Can I safely generate revisons without this information?
I haven't looked at your code yet. I assume that, in the case where
I want a full revision library, your code would not leave the
,,patchset dir?
That would be an error. Browsers use it, for example.
As a first (and perhaps final) pass -- it would be fine just to
arch_get_patch to make it.
The ,,index and ,,index-by-name files are important as well.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is ,,patchset need in library revisions?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02